DEBUNKING Absurdly Racist Pro-Abortion Arguments

Uploaded By: Michael Knowles

Get 3 Months of ExpressVPN FREE! https://www.expressvpn.com/michaelknowlesshow

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. https://www.youtube.com/c/MichaelKnowles 

Leftists on Twitter let their racism shine through poorly thought-out arguments. Knowles weighs in.

Watch the full episode here: https://bit.ly/3Mui7Kl

Watch full episodes of The Michael Knowles Show here: https://bit.ly/3uRc3VV

Become a Daily Wire Member today to gain access to exclusive content: https://utm.io/ud1Bz

Grab your Daily Wire merch here: https://utm.io/udZpp

My new book, ’Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds,’ is available now wherever books are sold. Unpack the history of political correctness and what it means for our future when you grab your copy here: https://utm.io/udtMJ

#MichaelKnowles #TheMichaelKnowlesShow #News #Politics #DailyWire #Abortion #ProLife #ProChoice #RoeVWade

Watch more at: DEBUNKING Absurdly Racist Pro-Abortion Arguments

27 thoughts on “DEBUNKING Absurdly Racist Pro-Abortion Arguments”

  1. what about mixed race family's? this makes no sense. I mean racism doesn't make sense at all because we are all the same… skin color does not dictate personality. my mom is mixed white and native and my dad is mixed white and African American. My husband is mixed European and i had my first child with an African American man. so i don't even understand how to be racist. i was teased as a kid for being mixed and as an adult with a dark skinned son and a red haird daughter i get asked all the time if my kids are adopted. It really bothers me that people dont understand that mixed families are a thing. or why it matters.

    Reply
  2. 25% Hispanic? I’m so sick of people saying Hispanic is race. It’s a cultural-linguistic group, not a racial one. This needs to end.

    Reply
  3. This author only views the world through a white lens. What a terrible white supremacist.

    Reply
  4. Okay dude, there is a better way to argue against this outside of going into semantics of how one defines the word "majority". How about this? The percentage of blacks aborting children is DOUBLE their actual population size. There are more black babies being aborted than are actually being born, thus the Black Population has actually STAGNATED in its growth. Thus, logically banning abortions would actually increase the black population in this country, not the white population.

    And that is why they're idiots for making this type of argument against people who actually know the data.

    Reply
  5. 6:12 Place ANY other race in there and see how insanely vile and racist that is…"I'd rather kill my kid than allow them to live with a black family." "I'd rather my child die than be raised by Asians." This is the SAME spirit if hate we saw in the days of slaver, Jim Crow, etc…there's simply a different target.

    Reply
  6. You realize explaining plurality vs majority is lost on the 40 and under Liberals. They went to college to study race and gender identity. They get their facts from social media not a book. They have no common sense or reasoning or problem solving abilities.

    Reply
  7. what this goes to show is people will say/do anything as long as some kind of incentive is involved.

    Reply
  8. Abortion doctors who quit and become pro life
    Abortion survivors who live and thrive
    Ultrasounds revealing the baby screaming in pain and trying to get away during abortions
    Traumatized and PTSD women regretting their decision
    For these reasons and more, the future is Pro Life!

    Reply
  9. The best and brightest the pro abortion people have are developmentally struggling. They're lost, and don't know how to find the door out.

    Reply
  10. A simple hypothetical thought experiment nullifies the question of life meaning if this offering was substituted to all would we exist after 100 hundred years. If we exist then non life not needed for existence, if we do not exist then it is indeed life needed for existence so the question of life is nullified in accordance to the hypothetical thought experiment not that this would happen in reality but none the less proves without a shadow of doubt that the process is rendering life obsolete or its trajectory and language is false as death is the end result to human life. Now what remains is how or why this happens and why was it first introduced if its trajectories are wrong in accordance with evolution or survival itself in its opposition to life continuation or survival which are foundations of law itself based in survival freedom to be or live without interference from outside forces which are hostile in intent. If survival is a universal pursuit created on earth and all other species follow this course than why has law created a platform for human life to be ousted? Is human life worthy of respect in accordance with say other animals that roam the earth who do not kill offspring as this is non progressive in nature and intent or at an evolutionary level non existent. The law creates an environment where by a place of original purpose and sanctuary becomes a place of non survival or growth its been flipped on its original position or purpose and its results are opposing to creation or evolutional positions or trajectories which are continuation reproduction and survival based positions.

    Reply
  11. Math is hard for stupid people . . . You’d think that you could just look at the breakdown percentage of the population and figure out what groups are the mostly negatively effected by abortion.

    Reply
  12. The infographic should state if it was white+white, black+black, asian+asian, hispanic+hispanic or mixtures

    Reply
  13. You have to class human life itself even in its infantile form as an extension of self to be guarded or protected as survival intends or the natural phenomena which one follows passed down from the constituents of time itself in form or structure. Life and survival or death and non survival without all the other degrees of non sensical confusion created for our own amusement to ponder. We have a survival force or extension of survival passed down from each generation with the particular code of survival itself interlinked into DNA guaranteed by the extension of reproduction life's only tool to pass on information. If the information code is distorted or if the information itself is non survival in its method than that information or trajectory has been confused or distorted in its process. The hypothetical extension or survival extension itself first is self purposed than it is passed onto offspring as its next action and so on and so forth with the survival extension itself giving room for the potential expansion of development with emotionally bonds of love through the vessel of survival passed onto other with that port being offspring. You cannot have any other potential growth without survival of life and its adaptation of self including love which love stems through the process of survival or grows from it as you cannot have love or its potential without survival of life through reproduction so to cancel life in this respect is not correct in its form.
    . From these basic scriptures develops all other scripture or methods and the torch is passed.

    Reply
  14. Since the dawn of time on planet earth all creatures including humans go through a process where by survival is pursued or death is avoided which is the process of continuation of self including self replication or copy which is done by the metric of reproduction which all animals insects and others naturally follow so evolution of self can proceed it or growth of self. No other species or creatures on earth even with lower brain capacities or size of brain cancels its potential out or cancels its off spring for evolutionary reasons or for survival reasons except one exception us. That is one obvious reasoning which is survival or continuation relative coupled with evolutionary justification. Then we have the overall universal laws which govern space or time which follow particular trajectories including creation, continuation of structures and growth varying in particular forms but strict in its policy of survival creation continuation of form or structures so that evolutionary change is possible. If life itself was self destructive or self defeating in anyway life or structure formation and growth would be nullified or non relative itself as this is a matter of relative or non relative at its basic meaning. Then we have the essence of emotion and love into which was formed from survival and protection of self as this survival orientation or love stems from the power of life which survival is based into which is passed through genetics onto its structure creation in formation replication process or copy transfer process through RNA or DNA but it needs a pattern or process to follow which is survival reproduction and transfer before evolution itself is possible which again is universal in the constituents that make the cosmos reality. By destroying human potential or offspring we reverse the naturally flow or process and the trajectory off life is distorted probably for political reasons vote harvesting and to garner a large portion of votes with the promise of power at the expense of life itself but it creates divisions at its primal core both at a human level and societal level if one does not follow suit.

    Life is about a battle for survival in a hostile environment so that one can become strong why make the place of sanctuary and growth a hostile environment why should we think that opposing survival is somehow worthy of respect when its opposite the force of nature? Shouldn't life be worthy of respect especially and be protected in its infantile form as nature intends or should we oppose nature and destroy itself so that we can celebrate and class it as a win for life? If anything the size of brain and human consciousness is linked to survival at more increased frequencies this business of killing human offspring is barbaric and infantile and medieval in its composition.

    Reply
  15. Do they not realise that state supported abortion can result in state forced sterilisation?? Look at China. Screw China it happened in Britain up into the mid 70's.

    Reply
  16. People need to learn to keep their legs closed.
    Oh yeah that's right we live in the last days it's only going to get worse as time progresses. It's sad and infuriating that people want to commit murder then post it on social media. The only reason why these scumbags are alive is because they didn't get aborted.

    Reply
  17. I thought abortion was a minority right. They just want to destroy everything that bears God image ,

    Reply
  18. Love your channel , Michael Knowles, as well as your morals and ideals. May God continue to bless you and your family.

    Reply
  19. The ones who shouted "Baby killers" at returning vets are the ones who support "choice".

    The irony isnt lost on me….

    Reply

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: